☀ Key Stats
◆ Government revenue in the East Asian economies covered by the World Bank comparison averages 20.4% of GDP, below the 25.0% average for middle-income countries and 37.0% for high-income countries.
◆ Primary government expenditure averages 14.1% of GDP, roughly two-thirds of the middle-income-country average and less than half the high-income-country level.
◆ Public investment moves in the opposite direction, averaging 6.5% of GDP in East Asia versus 4.4% in middle-income countries and 4.6% in high-income countries.
◆ Raising education spending in selected East Asia and Pacific economies to the average levels of Japan and South Korea could increase annual GDP per capita growth by an estimated 0.97 percentage point on average.
◆ In 14 of the region’s 22 middle-income economies, more than half of 10-year-olds cannot read and understand age-appropriate material, according to evidence cited by the report.
◆ Extreme poverty fell from 37% in 2001–05 to 6% in 2021–24, but 76% of the population outside China had still not reached the report’s middle-class living-standard threshold.
◆ The World Bank estimates that more effective collection of goods and services taxes could raise an additional about 2% of GDP in revenue on average across the East Asian economies analyzed.
◆ More than half of annual natural-disaster losses worldwide occur in East Asia and Pacific, while natural disasters already cost Pacific Island countries more than 2% of GDP each year.
◆ The report cites estimates that leakages in public investment can reach 50%–60% of invested funds in some developing East Asia and Pacific economies.
Continue reading ↓
Government revenue in the East Asian economies covered by the World Bank’s comparison averages just 20.4% of GDP, compared with 37.0% in high-income countries, according to a new World Bank report.
The Small Governments, Big Ambitions report describes a regional model built around relatively low taxes, restrained government spending and comparatively high investment in infrastructure.
That approach helped support decades of rapid economic growth, but the World Bank argues that it has also left governments with less room to spend on education, health, social protection and climate adaptation.
East Asia spends less but invests more
The difference is particularly clear when government spending is compared with public investment.
Primary government expenditure averages 14.1% of GDP in East Asia, roughly two-thirds of the middle-income-country average and less than half the high-income-country level.
Public investment, however, averages 6.5% of GDP.
That is higher than the 4.3% recorded in low-income countries, 4.4% in middle-income countries and 4.6% in high-income countries.
The pattern reflects the region’s long-standing focus on transportation, energy and other physical infrastructure intended to support private investment and economic activity.
The report cautions that fiscal budgets do not capture the state’s entire role in the economy, because state-owned enterprises and other quasi-fiscal entities also have a substantial presence in several countries.
Pacific Island countries also differ sharply from the East Asian pattern.
Their revenues and spending tend to be much larger relative to GDP because small economies, geographic isolation, recurrent disasters and high fixed costs make public services more expensive to provide.
Rapid growth has become less productivity-driven
The low-tax, infrastructure-heavy model accompanied one of the world’s fastest periods of regional economic growth.
Between 1999 and 2019, East Asian economies grew by an average 5.6% per year, compared with 4.0% across emerging and developing economies and 2.6% in advanced economies.
But the composition of that growth has changed.
The contribution of total factor productivity to economic growth fell from about 0.8 percentage point during 2001–15 to close to zero during 2016–23.
That means recent growth has depended more heavily on adding capital than on improvements in efficiency and productivity.
The report argues that stronger human capital will become increasingly important as economies attempt to move from middle-income status toward more skill- and technology-intensive growth.
Closing the education spending gap could add 0.97 point to growth
Education is one of the clearest examples of the tradeoff between low government spending today and potential economic growth later.
In 14 of the region’s 22 middle-income economies, more than half of 10-year-olds cannot read or understand age-appropriate material, a condition the World Bank describes as learning poverty.
The report estimates that raising education spending in selected East Asia and Pacific economies to the average levels of Japan and South Korea could increase annual GDP per capita growth by an average 0.97 percentage point.
The estimate is not a forecast and does not mean additional education spending would automatically produce that amount of growth.
The World Bank pairs its case for higher spending with reforms aimed at teacher quality, accountability, health-service delivery and the efficiency of public investment.
Poverty plunged, but most people have not reached middle-class living standards
The region’s past growth produced a major reduction in poverty.
The share of people living in extreme poverty fell from 37% in 2001–05 to 6% in 2021–24.
But the report estimates that about 61% of the region’s population had still not reached its middle-class living-standard threshold.
Excluding China, that share rises to 76%.
The World Bank says economic growth has historically done much more to reduce poverty in the region than redistribution through taxes and government transfers.
At the same time, its analysis finds that health and education spending plays the largest role in reducing inequality among the fiscal programs it examines.
Better tax collection could raise about 2% of GDP
Increasing spending would require governments either to redirect existing budgets, improve efficiency or collect more revenue.
The World Bank estimates that East Asian economies could raise an additional about 2% of GDP on average through more effective collection of goods and services taxes, including excises.
The largest estimated gaps between actual collections and modeled tax capacity are in Malaysia, the Philippines and Viet Nam.
The report favors broadening tax bases and reducing exemptions rather than relying only on higher statutory tax rates.
It also identifies personal income taxes, property taxes, carbon pricing and health-related excise taxes as potential revenue sources, while stressing that tax design and administration affect both efficiency and equity.
Climate risks and aging populations are adding pressure
The fiscal model is also being tested by risks that were less prominent during the region’s earlier decades of rapid growth.
More than half of annual natural-disaster losses worldwide occur in East Asia and Pacific, according to the report.
Natural disasters already cost Pacific Island countries more than 2% of GDP each year.
Without major adaptation efforts, the World Bank says coastal, river and chronic flooding could produce GDP losses of 5%–20% by 2100 in China, Indonesia, the Philippines and Viet Nam.
Population aging creates a separate fiscal challenge through higher pension, health and long-term-care costs and a smaller working-age population supporting contribution-based systems.
Many East Asia and Pacific economies moved from an aging to an aged society in only 20–25 years, compared with roughly 50–100 years or more in much of Europe and other richer economies.
More spending will not help if much of it is lost
The report does not argue that larger government budgets alone will produce better outcomes.
It cites estimates that leakages in public investment have reached 50%–60% of funds invested in some developing East Asia and Pacific economies.
At that scale, weaknesses in project selection, procurement and implementation can sharply reduce the value governments receive from additional spending.
The World Bank therefore combines its call for more investment in human capital, infrastructure and climate resilience with proposals for stronger procurement, project appraisal, fiscal rules, tax administration and digital government systems.
✦ Why it matters ✦
East Asia’s fiscal model helped support decades of rapid growth without requiring governments to collect or spend as large a share of national income as richer economies.
The challenge is that the economic conditions surrounding that model are changing.
Productivity is contributing less to growth, populations are aging rapidly and governments face growing costs from climate risks, health needs and social protection.
At the same time, education and health gaps can make it harder for workers to move into the more productive jobs needed for countries to reach high-income status.
That human-capital challenge also connects with recent StatsJournalist coverage of the global youth jobs gap.
The report’s 0.97-percentage-point education estimate illustrates the possible economic payoff from closing spending gaps, but it also highlights why the quality of spending matters.
Simply raising taxes and expanding budgets would not guarantee stronger growth if public money is poorly targeted or lost through inefficient implementation.
The central fiscal question is therefore not only how much East Asia’s governments collect and spend, but whether they can raise more revenue efficiently and redirect it toward investments that improve productivity, resilience and economic security.
ⓘ How to read the findings
The headline 20.4% revenue figure is an unweighted average for 2000–22 covering Cambodia, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Mongolia, the Philippines, Thailand and Viet Nam. It is not an average for every economy in East Asia and Pacific.
The 14.1% primary-expenditure figure and 6.5% public-investment figure use different spending concepts. Public investment is reported separately and its comparison covers 2000–19.
Pacific Island economies have structurally higher revenue and spending ratios, so their fiscal systems should not be treated as identical to those of the larger East Asian economies.
The estimated 0.97-percentage-point increase in annual GDP per capita growth is a modeled comparison, not a World Bank forecast of future growth.
It compares average education spending during 2010–19 in selected economies with the average spending levels of Japan and South Korea during the same period. Malaysia and Mongolia are excluded because their average education spending was already above that benchmark.
The estimated additional 2% of GDP in goods and services tax revenue represents modeled tax capacity rather than money governments are guaranteed to collect. Actual revenue would depend on policy design, compliance, informality and administrative capacity.
The report’s middle-class threshold is $15 per person per day in 2021 purchasing-power-parity terms. The 76% figure excludes China and should be interpreted using that specific definition.
The projected 5%–20% GDP losses from flooding by 2100 describe potential long-term losses without major adaptation efforts. They are not estimates of current annual economic damage.
The 50%–60% public-investment leakage estimate applies to some developing economies cited by the report and should not be interpreted as a region-wide leakage rate.
The report combines original World Bank analysis with IMF, World Bank and other datasets and findings from earlier research. Country coverage, reference years and methodologies therefore vary across individual statistics.
The World Bank discloses that its mAI tool, powered by Claude Sonnet 4.6, supported literature review, summarization of background evidence and editing. The report says the authors developed, reviewed and verified the analytical judgments, policy interpretations and conclusions.
